Ladies, Will You Consider Signing The Following Prenuptial Agreement?

I’m 44.
There is nothing “fair” about what you wrote and it certainly wasn’t written by anyone professing to “love” another human being. So only an idiot would sign it. Even then, it wouldn’t be binding in a court of law. It’s an illegal agreement that cannot stand up in court.

no.
1. You only get what you earn and what is in your name, AND HALF OF WHATEVER THE TWO OF YOU WORK FOR AND OBTAIN TOGETHER.
2. Both parents created the kids, therefore both parents provide for their support. One by helping to put a roof over their head, clothes on their back, and food on their table PLUS physically in person taking care of their day to day lives, and the other by providing financial support.
3. The mother can have the kids, and in the case of no visits wanted by the father (yuck, what an awful father), the kids will go and live with grandparents or other relatives in the case that the mother cannot support them. The kids should not be forced to go and live with a man who doesn’t even care enough about them to see them otherwise.
4. If for some reason the kids do end up with the father who didn’t even care enough to visit them otherwise, if this father furthermore cares SO little about the kid’s feelings that he would rip away their mother from ever being able to see them, this father should not have custody of them in the first place.
ALL of this also applies if the situation is reversed. If the mother tried to do that to the father.
In either case, the parents are completely failing to put the needs (both emotional and physical) of their children FIRST and are intent on using the children as pawns in their game of “I can hurt you worse than you can hurt me”. This is despicable.
I’m 48 years old. Female.

I am 45 and just got married. And no, I would not sign a pre-nup like that (or of any kind). Child support, by the way, generally falls outside the parameters of a pre-nup. If you are the father you are legally bound to support them – no ifs, ands or buts. If a court determines that visitation with either of the parent is in the best interest of the child (and they usually do) you’d be hard pressed to use a signed pre-nup to restrict visitation with a parent who wants visitation. If you are seriously asking this question for yourself, I’d suggest you consider a vasectomy. I’d also suggest woman who would seriously consider signing such a pre-nup get her head examined.

22 years old.
No I wouldn’t. …only reason is:
“You can have the kids (no visits wanted by the father) but if you can’t support the kids, then give them to the father, he will support them, but you will not see them ever again until they are adults.”
I feel no matter what – both parents should be involved the childs’ life. That is wrong to deprive them of that.
Good luck.

Are you serious!?!?!?!??!? That sounds like he doesn’t give a damn about the kids either way! I’m hoping that you’re not serious.

No, I’m 23 and married and not only would i not accept that prenup I’d dump the guy.

No I would not sign that And i’d get rid of you. How can you tell your future wife if you have children and she can’t support them and you will not help your children too I may add. that you would take them away from her and she will NEVER be able to see them till there adults. What mother would agree to that. Those are her kids too. She would love them .
Your just cruel marry yourself cause thats all who will want you.

Absolutely not. I am 29.
To me, the problem is not the money. It is the kids and the conditions set for their support/care in this question.

No way – early 40′s. You both brought these kids into the world and you BOTH support them.

Ahhh Hell No, I wouldn’t sign that!
By the way, I’m 42 and married for 20 years.

Sounds fair to me, but most women would not agree.

I wouldn’t sign it sorry. i’m 18

Nope. That prenup wreaks of callous and coldness. If I knew the guy really loved me, there would be no need for a prenup. I’m in my 30′s, and happily married.

No.
It is poorly worded.
It is not legal.
If I decide to keep my children, you will be paying support, whether or not you decide to have contact with them.
48 years old
Mother to 3
Widowed and remarried

I would NOT sign that prenup. I’m 20

The problem I would have is that the worst happened and the couple divorced the poor children would have a parent ripped out of their life. So NO I would not sign this, some love.

I am 29 and I would not sign that. I would never sign a prenup anyway unless I someone who was a well-known wealthy celeb. The whole thing with the children seems extremely unfair. What if the children want to see the other parent? What if the parent who has the children comes upon hard times? What if the parent who has the children can’t work to support them?

Oh wow. I am 29 and i would never ever sign that. Considering I am in the field of mental health and i do marital and spousal support groups and counseling…wow, i would never sign that. the husband must be on drugs.

Not only no, but HELL NO!!!!
Marriage is a contract, but it is also the blending of two lives. What is yours should be hers, and vice versa. If you want to keep everything seperate, then remain single!!

Are you kidding? Who in their right mind would agree to something like this?

Absolutely not (28). That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard and no woman in her right mind would sign that. For that matter, no woman in her right mind would want to marry someone that ego-centric and selfish. It takes two people to make a child, you know.

not the man for me…

There is no way in Hell that I or any other woman who’s in there right mind,would sign your stupid prenuptial agreement. I am 28 years old

I am 25 years old and no i wouldn’t sign that because of the kids part……we both made the kids therefore we both should support them not just one person should suffer on that part

Without reading the prenup, my answer is NO. It’s marriage, not a business deal.
I’m 28, married with 4 kids.

I’m 24….and if I read that I would leave your *** on the spot.

hell no i will never sigh that

Hell no! I am 41

Maybe….but I would feel hurt that he wanted me to sign a prenuptial. It’s almost like he doesn’t feel like we wouldn’t make it.

hell no! and pre-nup or not, there are laws regarding child support…37

First of all, I’d never sign ANY prenuptial agreement. If you’re already planning for how to handle a divorce there’s no way in hell I’m going to marry you. Second, if by some miracle I did agree to negotiate one I’d certainly want something a bit more… I think “even” is the wrong word but it will have to work. If there are kids involved, I’d expect both parties contribute to their upbringing and be part of their lives even if the marriage did break up. Not the kids’ fault mom and dad are getting a divorce.
Oh, and I’m somewhere between 26 and 32.